Our compassion was hijacked years ago. How else could our perception of reality be so twisted that we believe biological men should compete in sports against biological women? That it is a moral imperative to teach young girls and boys they can be a boy, a girl, a boy and a girl, or neither? That tampons should be in K-12 boys’ bathrooms? That minors should be able to pursue chemical castration without parental approval?
Most humans ache for a troubled, unhappy child and would do whatever possible to bring them comfort. This basic human compassion has been teased into a grotesque acceptance of policies that risk the health of both our gender confused youth and kids in general. Equally disturbing, “gender affirming care” increases the demand for transgender care, which increases the number of opportunists who lobby for more “gender affirming care”. A nationally orchestrated cycle of Munchausen by Proxy. Who wins? Opportunists. Who loses in the short term? Confused kids. Who loses in the long term? All of us.
From “What Are Your Words” by Katherine Locke
Many are unaware how far this insanity has spiraled since Obama gave the gender snowball a shove via administrative and executive actions in 2009. Very few objected. Would we have blocked Obama’s pen if we knew it would result in our kids being taught “See, when you were born, you couldn’t tell people who you were or how you felt. They looked at you and made a guess. Maybe they got it right, maybe they got wrong”. Would alarm bells have gone off if parents knew “gender affirming care” could lead future kids to declare “they got it wrong” and unilaterally pursue irreversible, life altering drugs and surgery as minors?
From “It Feels Good To Be Yourself” by Theresa Thorn
As we witnessed with appalling clarity during Covid, once a snowball gets rolling encouraged by politicians, institutions and a media machine that cancels opposition, folks tend to jump on board. “Of course we have compassion for kids with gender dysphoria, love is love”, they mimic. Sadly people are too busy to see the rot beneath the pretty words or consider what this snowball will look like in a decade. Nor do they wonder why the snowball got pushed over the cliff initially. Or why our compassion and acceptance of those with gender dysphoria isn’t enough and to be truly supportive, we must deny the link between gender and biology for all humanity. Note less than 1% of the population were transgender when this movement began.
For those who wish to critically evaluate this movement, it’s important to determine where we are and where the transgender snowball is headed. Let’s start by understanding that most kids will grow out of gender dysphoria by the end of adolescence. On the other hand, desistance is rare once puberty blockers are prescribed to a gender confused child (the federal government recommends blockers at age 12). Puberty blockers are not “reversible” when consider the full range of physical and psychological impacts not the least of which is a desire by almost all kids to continue with cross sex hormones (the federal government recommends cross sex hormones at 16). The combination of these drugs results in irreversible sterility, undeveloped sexual organs and other potential health issues. There appears to be no foolproof method to determine who will desist and whose gender dysphoria will persist. Since most 12-year-olds are incapable of grasping the ramifications of these drugs, treatment with comprehensive psychotherapy appears to be the only safe and humane avenue for gender confused minors. When the brain of a gender dysphoric young adult is fully developed, the individual can then decide if drug and surgical interventions are the appropriate course of action.
From “It Feels Good To Be Yourself” by Theresa Thorn
Next, let’s consider the future. Where will we be in ten years without a course change? Three states have passed laws that allow minors to pursue puberty blockers and cross sex hormones (ie sterility and other complications) without parental consent. How many more politicians will follow like sheep? Will a generation of children who have been taught that feelings supplant reality be easier to manipulate by future snowballs that target emotions? How does the push to unmoor children from their biology impact the family in the future? We have learned how the collapse of the family has impacted poor black communities. Can we expect similar destabilization in other communities? What will be the impact on the family as government entities insert themselves between kids and parents on health matters?
This is a small sampling of potential outcomes to ponder. We must take our collective heads out of the sand and face this issue head on. Lest folks think the above is nothing more than a right-wing talking point and, as such, should be ignored, let’s examine actual trends which will help us understand where we are and predict the future….
From “What Are Your Words” by Katherine Locke
Details
Note my previous article, “Through the Looking Glass” on the transgender movement is a deeper dive and would perhaps be helpful to understand the basics. The above seeks to communicate a few important details in a shorter format and set the stage for an examination of data and trends.
“A new law recently passed in California allows (foster) children as young as 12 years old to receive taxpayer-funded transgender treatments and services, without parental consent.” Source.
In 2015, Judicial Watch wrote regarding Oregon’s new law: “In a matter of months dozens of kids—some younger than 9—received taxpayer-funded, sex-change therapy in a state that earlier this year made it legal for minors to undergo radical treatment for “gender dysphoria” without parental consent.” Source.
In Washington, “the age of consent for obtaining health care services was lowered to 13 in a bill that went into effect in January of 2020.” Source. Note it appears that HB2288 referenced in this article to locate health centers on middle and high school properties which would effectively bypass parents, is dead. That it was even considered should raise eyebrows.
“Gender affirming care” has had an impact on how therapists approach treatment of gender confused kids. This article by Dr. Miriam Grossman is essential reading for anyone who wishes to understand the current state of care or for parents of a child who has declared they are transgender, especially Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD) that has impacted so many young girls. ROGD is a recent phenomena that many believe is caused by social contagion.
The photos from this article were taken from the following two books which are in many school libraries around the country. Brenda Lebsack, a teacher in California, forwarded them to me. I do not believe they are used in the classroom or if it is likely a child will encounter them. They do however provide insight in how gender ideology is communicated to children. I highly recommend listening. Please consider the impact on a young mind.
A byproduct of the “gender is a feeling” movement is that people who pee sitting down must share public restrooms with people who pee standing up. This is unacceptable. Their restrooms tend to get that not so fresh smell from pee landing in places it does not belong. Logic also dictates that crouchers who pee all over the toilet seat should be relegated to the standers’ bathroom. In fact, restroom usage should be divided not on how one feels but on who can keep their pee in the toilet bowl. Laws must be enacted and enforced. If absurdity is the norm let’s at least be practical.
Is the above any more absurd than men who wish they were women competing in sports with actual women? Or that anyone would ask a potential supreme court justice what the definition of a woman was and equally bizarre, the judge would refuse to answer? No.
Let’s take a step back and examine the gender and transgender narrative that’s dumped us all in the same restroom.
A narrative is often accompanied by the manipulation of language. “Prior to the 1950s, gender meant male or female, but applied only to grammar not persons. Latin based languages categorize nouns and their modifiers as masculine or feminine and for this reason are still referred to as having a gender.”Source.
Now definitions like this proliferate: “Genderrefers to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, expressions and identities of girls, women, boys, men, and gender diverse people. It influences how people perceive themselves and each other, how they act and interact, and the distribution of power and resources in society. Gender identity is not confined to a binary (girl/woman, boy/man) nor is it static,” etc.
The word gender itself has been transitioned.
The word “Intersex” describes an old phenomenon. In rare instances, people are born with abnormal chromosome combinations that result in both male and female characteristics. The first sex change operation on an intersex individual occurred in the early 1900s. While there is disagreement on the prevalence of intersex people, one calculation states they represent approximately .018% of US population.
Gender Identity Disorder is not new either although this condition is now referred to as Gender Dysphoria. “Gender dysphoria (GD) in children describes a psychological condition in which they experience marked incongruence between their experienced gender and the gender associated with their biological sex.” Source. “Children represent a small number of individuals with gender dysphoria and in only 10-20% of the children, gender dysphoria will continue to manifest in adolescence”. Source. These folks and intersex individuals deserve our compassion and hope for a fulfilling life. For perspective, a rough estimate of the number of GD individuals seeking sex reassignment surgery can be found in the Details section.
The label “gender nonconforming” is new but the concept is old. Gender nonconformity refers to the extent to which a person’s gender identity, role, or expression differs from the cultural norms prescribed for people of a particular sex.
What is new is the idea that we should teach children gender is fluid so they will accept and be compassionate towards those who suffer from gender identity disorder.
What is also new is the increased volume of GD diagnoses over baseline (referred to as excess demand in this article) and the willingness to treat GD chemically and surgically at younger and younger ages ignoring the data that at least 80% of GD cases resolve with psychotherapy alone by late adolescence. Unbelievably, in some clinics, chemical transition is initiated in the absence of comprehensive psychological evaluation.
It appears the increase in referrals to gender clinics has not been quantified although we can look at the explosion of clinics and surmise demand has grown significantly. The first US clinic to pioneer puberty blockers for children opened in 2007. According to one study, there are approximately 200 clinics and growing. This number does not appear to include Planned Parenthood clinics which have embraced puberty blockers and cross sex hormones. GD drugs and surgery have become big business.
Why are there so many more gender confused kids? Why has the number of young girls seeking transgender care surged? The chicken and egg debate rages but it is important to understand these questions have not been evaluated as outlined in this Dutch article. Without this essential data the federal government has issued official support for “gender affirming care” which can include social transition (name and pronoun), puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, surgery and psychotherapy. The federal government has also warned states they could be in violation of civil rights laws if they block minors from receiving “gender affirming care” even though the long term impact of puberty blockers on children has not been adequately studied.
Even without studies, it stands to reason that excess demand is driven by the relentless gender narrative of social media influencers, politicians, educators and the media coupled with the censorship of critics. The rhetoric resembles a well-executed marketing campaign. Gender drug pushers and surgeons welcome the new target market with open arms.
Another likely driver of excess demand is the age at which gender ideology is introduced. Is it wise to tell little kids that boys can be girls and girls can be boys? Imagine a prepubescent child’s reaction when presented with the Gingerbread Person or the Gender Unicorn, images that are clearly designed for a young audience. Once these concepts are in a child’s mind, will they confuse common body image concerns, normal identity questions and insecurities with GD? According to Erikson’s Psychological Stage Summary Chart, an important factor for adolescents is their search for personal identity. Is it possible the relentless gender messaging from teachers, children’s programming and social media will misdirect children in their search?
Like Alice, it feels like we have entered a fantastical world, where we find that, just like a reflection, everything is reversed, including logic. Did our society take a wrong turn through the looking glass?
It certainly appears so. Any human who has been around for a while witnessed the negative impacts of strict gender stereotypes and the existence of “gender noncomformists”. In the 1970s things visibly started to change. By the turn of the century expectations and assumptions had loosened to such a degree that those who march to their own drummer were celebrated.
The gender movement is regressive however and strict stereotypes are back. How can a 10 year old girl casually tell her parents she is not a girl unless society has narrowly defined how a girl behaves, how she thinks and what is expected of her? This is obvious “elephant in the living room” logic and is the crux of society’s wrong turn. We should bust the stereotypes not the reality of our biology.
Are there any other elephants that deserve our attention? Yes, big ones.
“Also, some experts noticed that a clear majority of children on GnRH therapy (puberty blockers) will decide to pursue cross-sex hormonal therapy.” Source. Other sources suggest this number is close to 100%. We have already learned that 80%-90% of GD resolves without drug intervention plus there has been a notable increase in children, particularly girls, seeking transgender care. Do the math. If we start children on puberty blockers whose GD would have otherwise resolved, we will increase the number of transgender adults who are also dependent on cross sex hormones. No doubt the pharmaceutical companies support “gender affirming care”.
Consider the distinctive manifestations of women and men in your own circles. How can gender labels and pronouns possibly encompass the depth of our uniqueness? They can’t. That is why the number of genders/pronouns has grown to ridiculous proportions, 64 by one count. Yet what is the endgame of gender transition? Male and female genitalia. A full circle of absurdity.
How can equal opportunity laws conceivably address the expanding number of genders?
When I was in grade school, the kids viciously teased an overweight girl because she was different. Imagine her isolation and trauma. Did the government issue a directive on “fat affirming care”? Of course not. Why would we force society at large to declare their pronouns and abandon biologic reality rather than teaching kids to be kind and accept the differences of others? Does anyone really believe “gender affirming care” will result in kids being nicer to those who are different? For example, a group of kids in a Maryland junior high bullied another group of kids because they were not bisexual. Junior high. Will the law of unintended consequences rear its ugly head as people are divided into small angry victim groups and kids turn on each other?
No amount of compassion for a gender confused individual supports a biological man playing on a women’s sports team. Note the Biden Administration is scheduled to release a revision to Title IX April 2022. Consider what that report will do to the polarization in this country.
A man who wants to be a woman can change his name and pronouns, elect chemical and physical castration, get breast implants and other feminine features but he will never be a woman with the ability to give birth and nurse her child. A woman who wants to be a man can select one of 78 pronouns, pursue hormone therapy, have a double mastectomy and radical hysterectomy. She will have a clitoris with penis clothing and will never be a man with the ability to impregnate a woman. The bottom line? Sex reassignment surgery is cosmetic and pronouns are superficial. Quite a sad reality for GD folks but it is a reality none the less.
Transgender individuals who pursue full chemical and surgical transition will be sterile, yet “a clear majority of them express the desire for reproductive potential after transition”. In a society that caters to the smallest minority, where will the transgender desire to maintain fertility lead our nation legally and ethically? The future is emerging already. Some states do not require surgical transition to change gender on birth certificates.
How will our unique, gifted or troubled children fare in this new environment. Will an influencer suggest their uniqueness is a sign of GD and recommend “gender affirming care”? Will one of the sleazy gender clinics put them on drugs without comprehensive psychological evaluation? Is it possible the side effects of these drugs will derail the natural development of their gifts or enflame underlying psychological conditions? Do we undermine our society by undermining our children?
Societal trajectories matter. In addition to ignoring the long-term impacts of transgender drugs, we are also ignoring the potential progression when reality is supplanted with desire. The furry movement comes to mind as does research into uterine transplants in men. What’s next?
How do we get back on track? Let’s apply common sense.
Can we return to simplicity, reality and acceptance? Let’s celebrate the beautiful diversity of being human, embrace our woman and manhood, reject gender stereotypes and revel in our differences. Let’s extend our understanding and acceptance to those with persistent GD without forcing society to participate in gender ideology. Let kids be kids, educate them on the basics, encourage them to be kind, turn off the gender marketing machine and cancel the drug pushers. This isn’t complicated. Common sense rarely is.
Wouldn’t the above actions be preferrable to splintering our society into an infinite number of angry victim groups who take offense at being called the wrong pronoun? To eliminating a key bedrock of human experience, our biology? To the gender wars developing between parents, schools, states and the federal government? To the manipulation of compassion which results in the incremental acceptance of senseless legislation? To the weaponization of greed to advance an agenda? To subjugate parents’ belief structures to the will of government?
Yes, reality grounded in common sense, compassion and pragmatism will unite us. The absurdity of modern gender ideology and associated legislation will rip this country apart, undermine our children and put this nation on dangerously shaky ground. We should reject it and equally important, determine why the government and their corporate cronies are hellbent on drugging our kids and splintering society.
SHAKY GROUND SUMMARY
Below is a summary of destabilizing factors addressed in this and previous articles in the America on Shaky Ground series.
Part 1–Division and distrust caused by the prohibition of gathering.
Part 2–Division and distrust caused by categorizing women and men into victims and oppressors.
Part 3–Division and distrust caused by racial segregation via victim/oppressor ideology.
Part 4 – Destabilize the populace by undermining the constitutional right of self-defense.
Part 5 – Propagation of false narratives designed to destabilize the populace and consolidate power.
Part 6– Destabilize US economic and national security with unsound energy policies.
Part 7 – Division via the splintering of society into an ever increasing number of “marginalized” victim groups. Destabilization caused by teaching kids to reject reality which will ultimately undermine children.
DETAILS
Gender ideology is complicated. The above only scratches the surface. For those who want a deeper dive, there are many resources above and below to get you started. My plan is to examine gender transition drugs in a future article. Regardless of the rhetoric to the contrary side effects of long-term use of puberty blockers and cross sex hormones have not been adequately studied. In addition, once the Biden Administration releases their proposed Title IX update, an article on the illogical outcomes of gender legislation will likely be in order.
Update 4.8.22 – New Jersey has updated their education standards. Gender ideology will be introduced in the 2nd grade. “Discuss the range of ways people express their gender and how gender- role stereotypes may limit behavior.“
How many transgender kids were referred for treatment prior to this movement (baseline)? Was this number consistent over the years? What is the number of kids claiming to be transgender now? I don’t know. I wonder if anyone does. This is important information, however. In search of a baseline estimate, it was suggested I review the 2013 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. While modern transgender narrative began prior to 2013, the Obama administration gave it a hefty push around then. “There are no recent epidemiological studies to provide data on prevalence of Gender Identity Disorder. Data from smaller countries in Europe with access to total population statistics and referrals suggest that roughly 1 per 30,000 adult males and 1 per 100,000 adult females seek sex reassignment surgery.” Census data reveals there were approximately 154,650,000 men and 161,610,000 women in 2013. Therefore approximately .003% of men and .001% of women sought sex change surgery in 2013. Did this number justify foisting fringe academic gender theory into mainstream culture?
Update 4.8.22 – After publishing this article, I became aware of the Gallup poll which seeks to measure the number of people who identify as LGBT. This is not surprising.
The reader will note that I did not touch on sexual orientation above. While that may be inexact because many of the new genders speak to orientation, I did not want to complicate the article further.
Upon the release of the above documents which endorse the use of puberty blockers and cross sex hormones, President Biden said among other things: “To transgender Americans of all ages, I want you to know you are so brave. You belong. I have your back.” With everything we have learned about a child’s need to belong, their search for personal identity and the fire hose of gender messaging, this statement is disturbing.
While the US government has embraced transgender drugs, Sweden’s top children’s hospital suspended puberty blockers. Note Sweden instituted their version of gender affirming care prior to the US and they are not the only country putting the brakes on drugging kids. https://segm.org/Sweden_ends_use_of_Dutch_protocol
The Gingerbread Person is a tool to teach gender ideology. https://go2tutors.com/what-is-the-genderbread-person-and-how-is-it-being-used-in-schools/ The Safe Zone Project, creates gender curriculums utilizing the gingerbread person. Sam Killerman, who is a gender and sexuality consultant, had a hand in creating both. Reading this material is recommended. Much of it seems fine until one realizes that these lessons teach kids they can be any gender “they know themselves to be”. I have been unable to confirm at what age this is introduced but have seen references as young as 4th grade and up. https://thesafezoneproject.com
Because some LGBTQ folks don’t agree with how gender is depicted on the Gingerbread Person, the TSER (Trans Student Educational Resources) created the Gender Unicorn which is also being taught in some schools. https://transstudent.org/graphics/ Studying the mission and message of TSER is highly recommended.
The American College of Pediatricians is opposed to the current transgender treatment protocol. They have been vilified and labeled as a hate group. For two vastly different perspectives read the releases of the Biden Administration “Gender Affirming Care” documents above and this ACP article. In a takedown of this article, an author suggested ACP misrepresented the twin study. I have reached out to ACP for clarification. https://acpeds.org/position-statements/gender-dysphoria-in-children
While generally in favor of transitioning, this article examines many ethical considerations that deserve the attention of all transgender practitioners and parents. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6020665/
TSER Graphic for Students
Please feel free to visit BayBuddha Travels for articles on a wide range of subjects.
